Head-to-head
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro vs Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro
A 0.1-point composite gap — but the real story is the dimension mix. Same weights, unpacked: who leads where, and whether the premium is justified.
#4 / 24
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro
ByteDance
Seven months on from 2.0: documents and charts filled in
Full dossier#5 / 24
Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
The practical ceiling for Chinese multimodal work
Full dossierThe short answer
The composites differ by 0.1 points, and their strengths do not overlap.
Stronger overall: effectively tied. If you only run one workload, read the dimension table instead.
Overlaid radar
Same weights, same scale; overlap means parity
- Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro95.3
- Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro95.2
Dimension deltas
A on the left, B on the right; 100 max per row
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro leads 3, Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro leads 5.
Spec sheet
Hard specs in one table
| Item | Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro | Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Composite | 95.3 | 95.2 |
| Tier | S+ | S+ |
| Visual perception & grounding | 96 | 97WIN |
| Document parsing & Chinese OCR | 97WIN | 96 |
| Chart & document reasoning | 95WIN | 94 |
| Video & long-horizon reasoning | 95 | 96WIN |
| GUI agents & tool use | 95WIN | 93 |
| Generation & editing | 87 | 88WIN |
| Chinese context & culture | 96 | 97WIN |
| Ecosystem, cost & availability | 97 | 98WIN |
| Output price | ¥13 / M | ¥15 / M |
| Context | 256K | 128K |
| Parameters | Undisclosed (MoE) | Undisclosed (MoE) |
| Licence | Closed commercial API | Closed commercial API |
| Native multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
How to choose
Choose Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro if…
- Chinese short-video moderation and tagging
- Long-table and cross-page document batches
- Mobile GUI agents and automation
- You cannot accept its limitation: Generation slips from 88 to 87; do not rely on it for creative design or image editing.
How to choose
Choose Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro if…
- Chinese short-video moderation and tagging
- Mobile GUI agents and automation
- Chinese e-commerce image understanding
- You cannot accept its limitation: At ¥15/1M output tokens, high-frequency image analysis gets expensive.
Scenario check
Five scenarios, who holds up
| Scenario | Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro | Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese receipt OCR | 96 | 95 | Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro |
| Chart data extraction | 94 | 93 | Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro |
| 30-min video QA | 95 | 96 | Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro |
| Mobile GUI control | 94 | 92 | Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro |
| Chinese cultural context | 96 | 97 | Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro |
Comparison FAQ
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro vs Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro: which is stronger?
Composite: Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro 95.3, Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro 95.2. Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro leads on Document parsing & Chinese OCR, Chart & document reasoning, GUI agents & tool use; Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro leads on Visual perception & grounding, Video & long-horizon reasoning, Generation & editing, Chinese context & culture, Ecosystem, cost & availability. The stronger overall is effectively tied.
How much more expensive is Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro than Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro?
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro is ¥13/1M output tokens; Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro is ¥15/1M. On output price, Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro is pricier; real cost also depends on image tokens and input share.
Can Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro replace Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro?
It depends on your primary workload. If it sits in Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro’s strengths (Chinese short-video moderation and tagging, Mobile GUI agents and automation, Chinese e-commerce image understanding), yes. If you need Chinese short-video moderation and tagging, switching will cost quality.
Personal ranking · Not an official score
Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.