Head-to-head
SenseNova 6.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
A 4.7-point composite gap — but the real story is the dimension mix. Same weights, unpacked: who leads where, and whether the premium is justified.
#3 / 24
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Alibaba
The multimodal flagship that behaves like infrastructure
Full dossierThe short answer
SenseTime for professional vision (industrial, medical, remote sensing); Qwen for general documents, multilingual work and developer speed.
Stronger overall: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B. If you only run one workload, read the dimension table instead.
Overlaid radar
Same weights, same scale; overlap means parity
- SenseNova 6.5 Pro89.9
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B94.6
Dimension deltas
A on the left, B on the right; 100 max per row
SenseNova 6.5 Pro leads 0, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads 8.
Spec sheet
Hard specs in one table
| Item | SenseNova 6.5 Pro | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Composite | 89.9 | 94.6 |
| Tier | A+ | S+ |
| Visual perception & grounding | 94 | 96WIN |
| Document parsing & Chinese OCR | 93 | 97WIN |
| Chart & document reasoning | 90 | 95WIN |
| Video & long-horizon reasoning | 89 | 92WIN |
| GUI agents & tool use | 86 | 92WIN |
| Generation & editing | 87 | 90WIN |
| Chinese context & culture | 92 | 94WIN |
| Ecosystem, cost & availability | 82 | 98WIN |
| Output price | ¥12 / M | ¥12 / M |
| Context | 128K | 256K (up to 1M) |
| Parameters | Undisclosed | 397B total / 17B active (MoE) |
| Licence | Closed commercial | Smaller sizes open (Apache-2.0); flagship closed |
| Native multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
How to choose
Choose SenseNova 6.5 Pro if…
- Industrial defect inspection
- Medical imaging triage
- Remote sensing and urban governance
- You cannot accept its limitation: Weaker general multimodal ecosystem and developer tooling.
How to choose
Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B if…
- Enterprise document hubs and contract review
- Multilingual product data extraction
- On-prem public-sector projects
- You cannot accept its limitation: The flagship is closed; only small and mid sizes are truly self-hostable.
Scenario check
Five scenarios, who holds up
| Scenario | SenseNova 6.5 Pro | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese receipt OCR | 92 | 96 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| Chart data extraction | 89 | 95 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| 30-min video QA | 87 | 91 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| Mobile GUI control | 84 | 91 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| Chinese cultural context | 91 | 94 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
Comparison FAQ
SenseNova 6.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: which is stronger?
Composite: SenseNova 6.5 Pro 89.9, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 94.6. SenseNova 6.5 Pro leads on none; Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads on Visual perception & grounding, Document parsing & Chinese OCR, Chart & document reasoning, Video & long-horizon reasoning, GUI agents & tool use, Generation & editing, Chinese context & culture, Ecosystem, cost & availability. The stronger overall is Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
How much more expensive is SenseNova 6.5 Pro than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
SenseNova 6.5 Pro is ¥12/1M output tokens; Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is ¥12/1M. On output price, SenseNova 6.5 Pro is pricier; real cost also depends on image tokens and input share.
Can Qwen3.5-397B-A17B replace SenseNova 6.5 Pro?
It depends on your primary workload. If it sits in Qwen3.5-397B-A17B’s strengths (Enterprise document hubs and contract review, Multilingual product data extraction, On-prem public-sector projects), yes. If you need Industrial defect inspection, switching will cost quality.
Personal ranking · Not an official score
Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.