NetEase Fuxi 2
NetEase · Undisclosed (MoE, content-optimised)
The multimodal player for games and content
NetEase’s content-oriented model: game NPC dialogue, fan creation and short-video content are home ground, with generation 82 and video 84 clearly above its document capability. Composite 77.5, ranked 29th — constrained everywhere in an “enterprise workflow” framing, yet a value option overlooked by comparisons in a “content production” framing.
Last updated Oct 18, 2026Editorial scoring
Bottom line
Eight-dimension breakdown
editorial mapping · 0–100- NetEase Fuxi 277.5
Weights: perception 20 / documents 18 / charts 14 / video 14 / agents 14 / generation 6 / Chinese 6 / ecosystem 8. Definitions and sources on the methodology page.
Public benchmarks
as reported, not converted| Benchmark / metric | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 内容生成连贯性 | 厂商内测第一 | Vendor figure |
| 输出单价 | ¥4 | Official API |
Public scores come from different versions and prompts and are not interchangeable with our composite; they are one evidence input.
Scenario mapping
five stress tests, one scale| Scenario | Score | Observation |
|---|---|---|
| Chinese receipt OCR | 68 · Not a target scenario | |
| Chart data extraction | 66 · Standard charts | |
| 30-min video QA | 80 · Good on content-oriented timing | |
| Mobile GUI control | 70 · Not trained for GUI | |
| Chinese cultural context | 88 · Same as our Chinese dimension |
Strengths and limitations
Strengths
- Generation 82: strong continuity on game assets, fan creation and short-video scripts.
- Video 84: accumulated content-oriented video understanding (rhythm, style, remix points).
- Chinese 88: deep priors on web fiction, danmaku and game terminology.
Limitations
- Documents 70, agents 75: both below the floor for enterprise workflows.
- No GUI modality; tool use is function-first.
- Ecosystem bound to NetEase’s game and content stack.
Price and real cost
List price
¥4/M tokens
≈ ¥4 / 1M output tokens. For 1,000 images at 1,024px, ~1,100 image tokens each and 300 output tokens, the monthly cost is about ¥2.4 (assuming input at 25% of output price).
Use your volumeAbout NetEase Fuxi 2
Is NetEase Fuxi 2 open source?
Licence: Closed commercial. No public weights; access is via vendor API or an on-prem licence.
How much does NetEase Fuxi 2 cost?
≈ ¥4 / 1M output tokens. It ranks #29 with a composite of 77.5. Real bills depend on resolution, tiling, caching and volume discounts.
What is NetEase Fuxi 2 best for?
Game NPC dialogue and asset generation; Short-video and remix content production; Multimodal assistance for anime and web fiction。
Why does NetEase Fuxi 2 score 77.5?
The composite weights eight dimensions: perception 20%, documents 18%, charts 14%, video 14%, agents 14%, generation 6%, Chinese 6%, ecosystem 8%. Its strongest dimension is Chinese context & culture; its weakest is Chart & document reasoning.
Personal ranking · Not an official score
Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.