Skip to content
#26A-Jul 18, 2026Evidence A

Intern-S2-Preview-397B

Shanghai AI Laboratory · 397B total (MoE)

A new open base for scientific multimodal work

A 397B scientific multimodal base released in July 2026 under Apache-2.0: charts 92, documents 91, perception 92 and a composite of 84.4. It replaces the sixth edition’s unverifiable InternVL 4.0 entry, which has no matching version in the official repository or papers. S2 is strong on research figures and paper layouts, and clearly weak elsewhere: video 72, agents 76 and generation 60, so it is not a general multimodal workhorse.

TextImageVideoNative

Last updated Oct 21, 2026Editorial scoring

Bottom line

If your inputs are papers, experimental charts and material atlases — high information density, low motion — Intern-S2 is the most fitting open-weight base in 2026: 397B of capacity, an Apache-2.0 licence and charts 92. Do not use it for short video, GUI or creative generation; all three sit below the enterprise floor. Price the hardware for a self-hosted 397B before committing.

Eight-dimension breakdown

editorial mapping · 0–100
Perception92Document91Chart QA92Video72Agent76Generation60Chinese87Ecosystem908D
  • Intern-S2-Preview-397B84.4
Visual perception & grounding20%
92
Document parsing & Chinese OCR18%
91
Chart & document reasoning14%
92
Video & long-horizon reasoning14%
72
GUI agents & tool use14%
76
Generation & editing6%
60
Chinese context & culture6%
87
Ecosystem, cost & availability8%
90

Weights: perception 20 / documents 18 / charts 14 / video 14 / agents 14 / generation 6 / Chinese 6 / ecosystem 8. Definitions and sources on the methodology page.

Public benchmarks

as reported, not converted
Benchmark / metricValueNote
参数规模397BOfficial model card
许可证Apache-2.0Commercial use and modification
上下文256KOfficial spec

Public scores come from different versions and prompts and are not interchangeable with our composite; they are one evidence input.

Scenario mapping

five stress tests, one scale
ScenarioScoreObservation
Research chart extraction92 · Stable on multi-panel figures and axes
Paper layout parsing91 · Reads formulas and two-column layouts
30-min video QA70 · Sparse-frame understanding only
Mobile GUI control72 · Not trained for GUI
Chinese academic context88 · Accurate terminology; average on colloquial text

Strengths and limitations

Strengths

  • Charts 92 and documents 91: among the best open-weight scores for research figures and paper layouts.
  • Apache-2.0 plus 397B: clean licensing and enough capacity for domain continued pretraining.
  • Grade A: weights, model card and evaluation scripts are all public and reproducible.

Limitations

  • Video 72 and generation 60: motion content and creative generation are out of scope.
  • Agents 76 is below the enterprise floor; tool use needs an outer orchestration layer.
  • Self-hosting 397B is expensive; small teams are better served by a hosted API or a distilled model.

Price and real cost

List price

—N/A

Open weights; self-hosted, no API fee. For 1,000 images at 1,024px, ~1,100 image tokens each and 300 output tokens, the monthly cost is about ¥0.0 (assuming input at 25% of output price).

Use your volume

About Intern-S2-Preview-397B

Is Intern-S2-Preview-397B open source?

Licence: Open weights (Apache-2.0). Weights are available, but check the exact terms and filing requirements before commercial use.

How much does Intern-S2-Preview-397B cost?

Open weights; self-hosted, no API fee. It ranks #26 with a composite of 84.4. Real bills depend on resolution, tiling, caching and volume discounts.

What is Intern-S2-Preview-397B best for?

Research papers and experimental charts; Domain image-text work in materials, biology and remote sensing; Domain continued pretraining under Apache-2.0。

Why does Intern-S2-Preview-397B score 84.4?

The composite weights eight dimensions: perception 20%, documents 18%, charts 14%, video 14%, agents 14%, generation 6%, Chinese 6%, ecosystem 8%. Its strongest dimension is Visual perception & grounding; its weakest is Generation & editing.

Personal ranking · Not an official score

Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.