Skip to content
#09A+Mar 29, 2026Evidence A

LongCat-Next

Meituan · Undisclosed (discrete native multimodal)

Making vision and speech mother tongues

Unified discrete tokens for understanding and generation: OmniDocBench 0.152 beats dedicated VL models, MathVista 83.1, GenEval 84.44 — with little “multimodal tax” on text.

TextImageAudioVideoNative

Last updated Oct 18, 2026Editorial scoring

Bottom line

Architecturally the most interesting Chinese model of 2026: it shows discrete vision need not sacrifice OCR, and understanding can help generation. As a product, APIs, docs and SLAs are early — a research and self-build base, not yet a production default.

Eight-dimension breakdown

editorial mapping · 0–100
Perception92Document94Chart QA91Video87Agent88Generation92Chinese89Ecosystem728D
  • LongCat-Next89.2
Visual perception & grounding20%
92
Document parsing & Chinese OCR18%
94
Chart & document reasoning14%
91
Video & long-horizon reasoning14%
87
GUI agents & tool use14%
88
Generation & editing6%
92
Chinese context & culture6%
89
Ecosystem, cost & availability8%
72

Weights: perception 20 / documents 18 / charts 14 / video 14 / agents 14 / generation 6 / Chinese 6 / ecosystem 8. Definitions and sources on the methodology page.

Public benchmarks

as reported, not converted
Benchmark / metricValueNote
OmniDocBench0.152Lower is better; beats Qwen3-VL
MathVista83.1Visual math
GenEval84.44Image generation
C-Eval86.8No notable text regression

Public scores come from different versions and prompts and are not interchangeable with our composite; they are one evidence input.

Scenario mapping

five stress tests, one scale
ScenarioScoreObservation
Chinese receipt OCR93 · Outstanding on paper-grade documents
Chart data extraction90 · Good on academic charts
30-min video QA85 · Still early
Mobile GUI control86 · Surprisingly strong tool use
Chinese cultural context88 · General training data

Strengths and limitations

Strengths

  • Unified architecture where understanding and generation reinforce each other.
  • OmniDocBench beats dedicated VL models; the discrete-vision ceiling is broken.
  • Open and auditable — a good domain foundation.

Limitations

  • Early productization; APIs and docs immature.
  • Video and agent capabilities still incomplete.
  • High compute barrier for self-hosting.

Price and real cost

List price

¥2.5/M tokens

Open self-host, est. ¥2.5 / 1M output. For 1,000 images at 1,024px, ~1,100 image tokens each and 300 output tokens, the monthly cost is about ¥1.5 (assuming input at 25% of output price).

Use your volume

About LongCat-Next

Is LongCat-Next open source?

Licence: Open (research license). Weights are available, but check the exact terms and filing requirements before commercial use.

How much does LongCat-Next cost?

Open self-host, est. ¥2.5 / 1M output. It ranks #9 with a composite of 89.2. Real bills depend on resolution, tiling, caching and volume discounts.

What is LongCat-Next best for?

Multimodal architecture research; Custom industry foundation models; Unified document understanding and generation。

Why does LongCat-Next score 89.2?

The composite weights eight dimensions: perception 20%, documents 18%, charts 14%, video 14%, agents 14%, generation 6%, Chinese 6%, ecosystem 8%. Its strongest dimension is Document parsing & Chinese OCR; its weakest is Ecosystem, cost & availability.

Personal ranking · Not an official score

Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.