Skip to content
#27B+Jun 28, 2026Evidence C

Hikvision Guanlan 3

Hikvision · Undisclosed (security-video specialist, MoE)

The only multimodal model trained for surveillance video

A video specialist from a hardware vendor, trained mostly on surveillance footage — night-vision IR, low light, overhead views, cross-camera tracking. Composite 78.2, ranked 27th, and the only model on this board that enters the “surveillance video” class — with grade-C evidence (no public API, no third-party reproduction, figures from vendor and industry-solution channels).

TextImageVideoNative

Last updated Oct 18, 2026Editorial scoring

Bottom line

If your scenario is surveillance — perimeter intrusion, cross-camera tracking, crowd density, fire and smoke — it is the only option, delivered under industry licensing rather than the open market. For anything else, skip it: documents 75 and generation 60 put it well below its score peers. It is on this board for reasons unrelated to its rank — surveillance video is a modality every comparison skips, and the reason is data sensitivity, not lack of demand.

Eight-dimension breakdown

editorial mapping · 0–100
Perception92Document75Chart QA70Video91Agent68Generation60Chinese84Ecosystem708D
  • Hikvision Guanlan 378.2
Visual perception & grounding20%
92
Document parsing & Chinese OCR18%
75
Chart & document reasoning14%
70
Video & long-horizon reasoning14%
91
GUI agents & tool use14%
68
Generation & editing6%
60
Chinese context & culture6%
84
Ecosystem, cost & availability8%
70

Weights: perception 20 / documents 18 / charts 14 / video 14 / agents 14 / generation 6 / Chinese 6 / ecosystem 8. Definitions and sources on the methodology page.

Public benchmarks

as reported, not converted
Benchmark / metricValueNote
安防事件召回率94.2%Vendor figure, not a public benchmark
夜视红外场景 mAP88.6Integrator test channel
部署形态边缘盒子 + 中心云Industry licensing delivery

Public scores come from different versions and prompts and are not interchangeable with our composite; they are one evidence input.

Scenario mapping

five stress tests, one scale
ScenarioScoreObservation
Chinese receipt OCR74 · Not a target scenario
Chart data extraction70 · Standard
Surveillance video understanding91 · The only entry on this board
Mobile GUI control60 · No such modality
IR night-vision recognition89 · Vendor figure

Strengths and limitations

Strengths

  • Surveillance-video priors far ahead: night-vision IR, low light and overhead angles are home ground.
  • Closed loop with hardware — edge boxes, NVRs and camera-side synergy give latency and cost structures no API model can match.
  • Industry delivery experience across campuses, transport and bank branches.

Limitations

  • Grade C: no public API, no third-party benchmark — every figure is vendor- or integrator-reported.
  • Weak on general documents and generation: documents 75, generation 60 — unusable outside surveillance.
  • No public pricing or SDK: procurement runs through industry licensing, outside any standard price comparison.

Price and real cost

List price

—N/A

No public API; ships with hardware and industry solutions. For 1,000 images at 1,024px, ~1,100 image tokens each and 300 output tokens, the monthly cost is about ¥0.0 (assuming input at 25% of output price).

Use your volume

About Hikvision Guanlan 3

Is Hikvision Guanlan 3 open source?

Licence: Closed · industry licensing. No public weights; access is via vendor API or an on-prem licence.

How much does Hikvision Guanlan 3 cost?

No public API; ships with hardware and industry solutions. It ranks #27 with a composite of 78.2. Real bills depend on resolution, tiling, caching and volume discounts.

What is Hikvision Guanlan 3 best for?

Perimeter intrusion and cross-camera tracking; Campus and transport surveillance understanding; Safety compliance (helmets, workwear)。

Why does Hikvision Guanlan 3 score 78.2?

The composite weights eight dimensions: perception 20%, documents 18%, charts 14%, video 14%, agents 14%, generation 6%, Chinese 6%, ecosystem 8%. Its strongest dimension is Visual perception & grounding; its weakest is Generation & editing.

Personal ranking · Not an official score

Every ranking, score and comparison on this page is an independent personal ranking, not an official score, and represents no vendor, institution or regulator. Scores are a subjective mapping of public evidence under our own weights — change the weights and the order changes. Disagree, or spotted a factual error? Contact the site owner: jizhi2024@foxmail.com — we check each report and log corrections in the changelog.